- N Bohr and J A Wheeler, Phys. Rev.56, 426 (1939)Google Scholar
- D J Hinde, R J Charity, G S Foote, J R Leigh, J O Newton, S Ogaza and A Chattejee, Nucl. Phys. A452, 550 (1986)Google Scholar
- J O Newton, D J Hinde, R J Charity, R J Leigh, J J M Bokhorst, A Chatterjee, G S Foote and S Ogaza, Nucl. Phys. A483, 126 (1988)Google Scholar
- I Dioszegi, N P Shaw, I Mazumder, A Hatzikoutelis and P Paul, Phys. Rev. C61, 024613 (2000)Google Scholar
- M Thoennessen and G F Bertsch, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 4303 (1993)Google Scholar
- V M Strutinsky, Phys. Lett. B47, 121 (1973)Google Scholar
- H A Kramers, Physica (Amsterdam)7, 284 (1940)Google Scholar
- H Hofmann and P J Siemens, Nucl. Phys. A257, 165 (1976)Google Scholar
- S E Koonin and J Randrup, Nucl. Phys. A289, 475 (1977)Google Scholar
- P Fröbrich and I I Gontchar, Phys. Rep.292, 131 (1998)Google Scholar
- Y Abe, S Ayik, P-G Reinhard and E Suraud, Phys. Rep.275, 49 (1996)Google Scholar
- J Sadhukhan and S Pal, Phys. Rev. C79, 064606 (2009)Google Scholar
- J L Egido, L M Robledo and V Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 26 (2000)Google Scholar
- J C Pei et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 192501 (2009)Google Scholar
- A V Ignatyuk et al, Nucl. Phys. A346, 191 (1980)Google Scholar
- F A Ivanyuk and H Hofmann, Nucl. Phys. A657, 19 (1999)Google Scholar
- Varinderjit Singh et al, Phys. Rev. C86, 014609 (2012)Google Scholar
- Varinderjit Singh et al, Phys. Rev. C87, 064601 (2013)Google Scholar
- A V Ignatyuk et al, Yad. Fiz.21, 485 (1975), [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.21, 255 (1975)]Google Scholar
- W Reisdorf, Z. Phys. A300, 227 (1981)Google Scholar
- A J Sierk, Phys. Rev. C33, 2039 (1986)Google Scholar
- S Pal and N K Ganguly, Nucl. Phys. A370, 175 (1981)Google Scholar
- J Blocki, Y Boneh, J R Nix, J Randrup, M Robel, A J Sierk and W J Swiatecki, Ann. Phys.113, 330 (1978)Google Scholar
- J P Lestone and S G McCalla, Phys. Rev. C79, 044611 (2009)Google Scholar
- P Fong, Phys. Rev.102, 434 (1956); Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 375 (1963); Phys. Rev. C10, 1122 (1974)Google Scholar
- J R Nix and W J Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys.71, 1 (1964)Google Scholar
- I I Gontchar, A E Gettinger, L V Guryan and W Wagner, Phys. At. Nucl.63, 1688 (2000)Google Scholar
- E G Ryabov, A V Karpov, P N Nadtochy and G D Adeev, Phys. Rev. C78, 044614 (2008)Google Scholar
- T Wada, Y Abe and N Carjan, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 3538 (1993)Google Scholar
- M Brack, J Damgaard, A S Jensen, H C Pauli, V M Strutinsky and C Y Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys.44, 320 (1972)Google Scholar
- S Pal, G Chaudhuri and J Sadhukhan, Nucl. Phys. A808, 1 (2008)Google Scholar
- J Sadhukhan and S Pal, Phys. Rev. C84, 044610 (2011)Google Scholar
- J Randrup and W J Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A429, 105 (1984)Google Scholar
- A V Karpov, P N Nadtochy, D V Vanin and G D Adeev, Phys. Rev. C63, 054610 (2001)Google Scholar
- P N Nadtochy, G D Adeev and A V Karpov, Phys. Rev. C65, 064615 (2002)Google Scholar
- P N Nadtochy and G D Adeev, Phys. Rev. C72, 054608 (2005)Google Scholar
- P N Nadtochy, E G Ryabov, A E Gegechkori, Yu A Anischenko and G D Adeev, Phys. Rev. C85, 064619 (2012)Google Scholar
Aug 5, 2014 - Stochastic Model of the Tilting Mode in Nuclear Fission. Downloaded to IP. Some of the classical theory of fission developed by these. Ture; Bohr and Wheeler estimate these excitation energies. Download Citation on ResearchGate| The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission| On the basis of the. Theory and experiment fit together in a reasonable way to give a satisfactory picture of nuclear fission. Request Full-text Paper PDF. Following their studies, Bohr and Wheeler interpreted the energy released from neutron.